|
Cuff 'N Stuff 05-31-02 |
Dumb
Crooks LETTIN' THE FLIES IN TAKING A CHOP OUT OF CRIME HE'LL BE A MODEL PRISONER MUZAK MUGGER MAYBE FOR AN X-BOX...
That Ragged Old Flag--Johnny Cash I walked through a county courthouse square "You see, we got a little hole in that flag there, It almost fell at the Alamo On Flanders Field in World War I, The Native Americans, She's been abused, burned, So we raise her up every morning
Legal
Issues The defendant was convicted of a drug offense and placed on probation. A condition of that probation was that the defendant submit “his person, property, place of residence, vehicle, personal effects, to search at anytime, with or without a search warrant, warrant of arrest or reasonable cause.” Shortly after being placed on probation, equipment of the local electric utility company was intentionally damaged. The defendant was a suspect because he had been charged with theft of service by the company, and his electric service had been discontinued for failure to pay his bill. Surveillance was established at the defendant’s residence, and he was seen carrying away three cylindrical objects that looked like pipe bombs and throwing them in an adjacent river. A sheriff’s deputy observed explosive materials and brass padlocks of the kind removed from the utility company’s damaged equipment vault in a truck driven to the defendant’s apartment by his friend, who also was suspected in the vandalism against the utility. Based on what he had seen, the deputy decided to conduct a search of the defendant’s apartment. He knew about the condition of probation, and decided he did not need a warrant. Inside the apartment, the deputy found detonation cord, ammunition, liquid chemicals, instruction manuals on chemistry and electrical circuitry, bolt cutters, telephone pole-climbing spurs, drug paraphernalia, and a brass padlock stamped with the initials of the electric company that had been vandalized. Following the defendant’s arrest on several federal charges, he moved to suppress the items found in his apartment. The trial court found that the deputy had reasonable suspicion, but that the search was for “investigative purposes.” Rather than for “probationary” purposes, and it ordered the evidence suppressed. The condition of probation did not specify that searches would be confined to probationary matters. The Supreme Court accepted the case to determine “whether the Fourth Amendment limits searches pursuant to [a] probation condition to those with a “probationary” purpose. Holding: In order to satisfy the Fourth Amendment, a search must be reasonable. Reasonableness is determined “by assessing, on the one hand, the degree to which it intrudes upon an individual’s privacy and, on the other hand, the degree to which it is needed for the promotion of legitimate governmental interests.” Probation is a form of punishment that limits a probationer’s freedom, and a court granting probation may impose reasonable conditions that deprive probationers of freedoms enjoyed by law-abiding citizens. The sentencing judge in the defendant’s case determined that it was necessary to condition his probation on acceptance of the search provision. “It was reasonable to conclude that the search condition would further the two primary goals of probation – rehabilitation and protecting society from future criminal violations.” The recidivism rate of probationers is significantly higher than the general crime rate, and probationers are more likely to violate the law than other citizens. Further, probationers have a strong incentive to conceal their criminal activities and dispose of criminal evidence that might lead to the revocation of their probation. On balance, a search of this probationer’s residence required no more than reasonable suspicion. While probable cause ordinarily is required to conduct a search, a lower level of suspicion suffices when, as here, the person’s privacy interests are diminished. For the same reasons that justify a search on reasonable suspicion, no warrant was required. The search in this case was supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized by a condition of probation. Consequently, it was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, even though conducted without a warrant. U.S. v. Knights, 122 S.Ct. 587 (2001)
WEATHERFORD JUNIOR COLLEGE DECATUR CAMPUS JULY 8 - JULY 10 AUGUST 16 **THIS IS A REQUIRED COURSE FOR TCLEOSE PEACE OFFICER - YOU WILL HAVE TO ATTEND ONE OF THESE TWO DAYS.
JDBGMGR.EXE New name. Same old hoax. Last May, the SULFNBK.EXE hoax caused thousands of gullible users to delete a perfectly legitimate system file. Now the same hoax is circulating, this time targeting the equally benign JDBGMGR.EXE. As with the SULFNBK.EXE hoax, it is likely a result of confusion caused by the Magistr virus. While the hoax mail urges users to search for and delete the file if it is found, in reality, JDBGMGR.EXE should be on the system - it is a standard windows component included with Internet Explorer (at least as far back as version 3.02). For those hapless folks who've deleted the file, reinstalling Internet Explorer or downloading an updated version of Microsoft Virtual Machine should solve the problem.
From the ChaplainSPEAKING “Blessed are they who have nothing to say and cannot be persuaded to say it” (James Russell Lowell). The six most important words: “I admit I made a mistake.” The five most important words: “You did a good job.” The four most important words: “What is your opinion?” The three most important words: “If you please.” The two most important words: “Thank you.” The most important word: “We.” The least important word: “I.” |
|
Crime Does Not Have To Be A Fact Of Life |